09-06-2005

 

Online îò 1 þëè 2002

 

Íà÷àëî

Ëèáåðòàðèóì

Çíàíèå Êëóá

Äîêóìåíòè

Ãàëåðèÿ

Ïðîåêòúò

Ïðàâèëà

Êîíòàêò

21 ìàðò 2005, 11:15

Vladimir Bukovsky:

I Would Welcome Greater Pressure upon Russia by the West

Interview door Daniela Gortcheva

Èíòåðâþòî íà áúëãàðñêè >>

 

Mr. Bukovsky, how do you see from now on the Russia-Chechnya relations after the killing of the moderate leader and legitimate president of Chechnya, Maskhadov, carried out by the Russian forces?

- I am afraid that the situation will deteriorate, will become more radicalized, that after Maskhadov’s murder the radical forces will get the upper hand in Chechnya. You know that Maskhadov insisted on peaceful negotiations, only recently declaring unilateral ceasefire, which may not

have been particularly welcome by some circles in Chechnya.

You suppose the situation in Chechnya will become more radicalized after Maskhadov’s killing? Still, Maskhadov had some influence...

- Undoubtedly Maskhadov had a great influence and even though there were some differences among the various Chechen groups, they all supported his offer for a ceasefire, and there is no other person with such authority in Chechnya, that’s a fact. Now it depends on who will take Maskhadov’s place but I am afraid that the adherents to radical solutions will acquire more influence.

Russian journalists and human right activists claim that to inisist on peace now is dangerous in Russia. Recently, criticism of Russia by the US and Europe seems to have increased and the Council of Europe also insisted that Russia end the war in Chechnya. Do you think it is possible that President Maskhadov’s killing was carried out at this time with the aim of hindering the possibility of starting peace negotiations?

- This can’t be ruled out, but is difficult to say, since the Russian special forces have been trying to kill Maskhadov for a long time, having even declared him a terrorist. It is well known that they have been preparing for Maskhadov’s murder for a long time and have been pursuing him for a long time. So that it might be a sheer coincidence that they killed him just now. However, the impression this murder left is just that. Whether correct or not, the impression is exactly that.

Yes, Maskhadov’s killing at this very moment looks like a cynical response by the Russian authorities to the efforts for ending the war.

- No doubt, this murder will hinder the peace movement, and will reduce the influence of the adherents to moderate solutions in Chechnya, this is quite obvious.

Several days before Maskhadov’s killing a meeting was held in London between the Union of Russian Soldiers’ Mothers and Zakaev, Maskhadov’s spokesman. The Russian soldiers’ mothers also insisted on beginning peace negotiations and supported Maskhadov’s peace plan. How did this meeting go?

- Yes, they talked with Zakayev, signed a joint declaration. They will continue their work, but how things will develop is difficult to foretell since the new leadership might take a more radical stance than the line supported by Maskhadov and Zakayev.

Didn’t the West miss the opportunity to support Maskhadov’s peace plan while he was still alive?  

- The West is very reluctant to deal with the war in Chechnya and to criticize Russia. The West has its own (even oil-related) reasons to consider Russia an important element of its anti-terror coalition, which, in my view, is very dubious. Until not long ago, Russia was hardly ever criticized. However, recently, the West has shown greater candor and criticism in its dealings with Russia. Bush’s criticism was rather mild and restrained but recently a tendency has been noticed to increase criticisms of Russia for its human right abuses. It’s difficult for me to prognosticate for how long this tendency will continue and develop but it is obvious that there is such a tendency.

How do you see from now on the development of  relations between Russia and the West? Will Putin continue enjoying the  double standard and soft attitude regardless of the drastic human right abuses in Russia?

- First of all, Bush’s criticism of Putin was rather restrained. Russia was expected to declare that it would continue with the democratic reforms and Putin to affirm his adherence to democracy, and Putin did that, he affirmed it but with a hint that in Russia they would continue with the reforms the way they think fit for Russia. I would welcome a greater pressure being put upon Russia by the West, and not only because of Chechnya but for the protection of human rights in Russia, for freedom of speech, etc.

Èíòåðâþòî å âçåòî çà "Äèàëîã" è ùå áúäå ïóáëèêóâàíî â àïðèëñêèÿ áðîé íà ñïèñàíèåòî

Íà÷àëî    Ãîðå


© 2005 Îùå Èíôî